Bitcoin Abuse Database: 1HPTGdcnRDcQtfAeE8GPdMQT2NPczHZ6EW

Unlock the power of blockchain!

/BlockChain is has gone private due to an extreme influx of ICO scams, snake-oil shills and plagiarized crypto-news blog spam. There is no application process and new members are not being added. Contacting the mod team will not result in an invitation.
[link]

The applications of the future

This subreddit is for sharing and discussing blockchain based systems including crytocurrencies, games, data networks and other services.
[link]

Datum: World's first distributed database and marketplace

Datum is the decentralized marketplace for social and IoT data. Powered by Ethereum, BigchainDB and IPFS.
[link]

The Bitcoin Blockchain Database

The Bitcoin Blockchain Database submitted by fredmkatz to bigquery [link] [comments]

Goxplorer 0.6.0, a Bitcoin blockchain explorer with embedded HTTP REST/JSON server and UTXO parsing support

Back in December, I announced here that I was working on a Bitcoin blockchain explorer with fairly basic capabilities, written from scratch with the Go language, mainly as a toy project. Back then it was only capable of reading raw block files and render them in JSON using various filters.
Six month later, with development going on and off, I am pleased to announce version 0.6.0 which is approaching the goal I was considering all along, being a self contained, self hosted blockchain explorer, only using Bitcoin blockchain's databases.
Goxplorer is capable of leveraging blocks index and chainstate LevelDB databases to fetch correct block files, meaning that you could search for a transaction involving an UTXO (chainstate only keeps track of those) only using your very bitcoin wallet / node.
The HTTP REST/JSON functionality permits to build a web client over it, I might even get into this as VueJS had me kind of liking it.
Finally, goxplorer has an easy to use callback system for programming plugins to be triggered at every transaction or block. A couple of examples, including a very naive bruteforcer, are available for the curious.
Homepage: https://imil.net/goxplore Binary releases for various popular platforms: https://gitlab.com/iMil/goxplore-/releases Source code: https://gitlab.com/iMil/goxplorer
As always, feedback is very welcome.
Edit: formatting Edit 2: release 0.6.1
submitted by iMil to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Craig Steven Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto

A couple of years ago in the early months of the 2017, I published a piece called Abundance Via Cryptocurrencies (https://www.reddit.com/C\_S\_T/comments/69d12a/abundance\_via\_cryptocurrencies/) in which I kind of foresaw the crypto boom that had bitcoin go from $1k to $21k and the alt-coin economy swell up to have more than 60% of the bitcoin market capitalisation. At the time, I spoke of coming out from “the Pit” of conspiracy research and that I was a bit suss on bitcoin’s inception story. At the time I really didn’t see the scaling solution being put forward as being satisfactory and the progress on bitcoin seemed stifled by the politics of the social consensus on an open source protocol so I was looking into alt coins that I thought could perhaps improve upon the shortcomings of bitcoin. In the thread I made someone recommended to have a look at 4chan’s business and finance board. I did end up taking a look at it just as the bull market started to really surge. I found myself in a sea of anonymous posters who threw out all kinds of info and memes about the hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands of different shitcoins and why they’re all going to have lambos on the moon. I got right in to it, I loved the idea of filtering through all the shitposts and finding the nuggest of truth amongst it all and was deeply immersed in it all as the price of bitcoin surged 20x and alt coins surged 5-10 times against bitcoin themselves. This meant there were many people who chucked in a few grand and bought a stash of alt coins that they thought were gonna be the next big thing and some people ended up with “portfolios” 100-1000x times their initial investment.
To explain what it’s like to be on an anonymous business and finance board populated with incel neets, nazis, capitalist shit posters, autistic geniuses and whoever the hell else was using the board for shilling their coins during a 100x run up is impossible. It’s hilarious, dark, absurd, exciting and ultimately addictive as fuck. You have this app called blockfolio that you check every couple of minutes to see the little green percentages and the neat graphs of your value in dollars or bitcoin over day, week, month or year. Despite my years in the pit researching conspiracy, and my being suss on bitcoin in general I wasn’t anywhere near as distrustful as I should have been of an anonymous business and finance board and although I do genuinely think there are good people out there who are sharing information with one another in good faith and feel very grateful to the anons that have taken their time to write up quality content to educate people they don’t know, I wasn’t really prepared for the level of organisation and sophistication of the efforts groups would go to to deceive in this space.
Over the course of my time in there I watched my portfolio grow to ridiculous numbers relative to what I put in but I could never really bring myself to sell at the top of a pump as I always felt I had done my research on a coin and wanted to hold it for a long time so why would I sell? After some time though I would read about something new or I would find out of dodgy relationships of a coin I had and would want to exit my position and then I would rebalance my portfolio in to a coin I thought was either technologically superior or didn’t have the nefarious connections to people I had come across doing conspiracy research. Because I had been right in to the conspiracy and the decentralisation tropes I guess I always carried a bit of an antiauthoritarian/anarchist bias and despite participating in a ridiculously capitalistic market, was kind of against capitalism and looking to a blockchain protocol to support something along the lines of an open source anarchosyndicalist cryptocommune. I told myself I was investing in the tech and believed in the collective endeavour of the open source project and ultimately had faith some mysterious “they” would develop a protocol that would emancipate us from this debt slavery complex.
As I became more and more aware of how to spot artificial discussion on the chans, I began to seek out further some of the radical projects like vtorrent and skycoin and I guess became a bit carried away from being amidst such ridiculous overt shilling as on the boards so that if you look in my post history you can even see me promoting some of these coins to communities I thought might be sympathetic to their use case. I didn’t see it at the time because I always thought I was holding the coins with the best tech and wanted to ride them up as an investor who believed in them, but this kind of promotion is ultimately just part of a mentality that’s pervasive to the cryptocurrency “community” that insists because it is a decentralised project you have to in a way volunteer to inform people about the coin since the more decentralised ones without premines or DAO structures don’t have marketing budgets, or don’t have marketing teams. In the guise of cultivating a community, groups form together on social media platforms like slack, discord, telegram, twitter and ‘vote’ for different proposals, donate funds to various boards/foundations that are set up to give a “roadmap” for the coins path to greatness and organise marketing efforts on places like reddit, the chans, twitter. That’s for the more grass roots ones at least, there are many that were started as a fork of another coin, or a ICO, airdrop or all these different ways of disseminating a new cryptocurrency or raising funding for promising to develop one. Imagine the operations that can be run by a team that raised millions, hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars on their ICOs, especially if they are working in conjunction with a new niche of cryptocurrency media that’s all nepotistic and incestuous.
About a year and a half ago I published another piece called “Bitcoin is about to be dethroned” (https://www.reddit.com/C\_S\_T/comments/7ewmuu/bitcoin\_is\_about\_to\_be\_dethroned/) where I felt I had come to realise the scaling debate had been corrupted by a company called Blockstream and they had been paying for social media operations in a fashion not to dissimilar to correct the record or such to control the narrative around the scaling debate and then through deceit and manipulation curated an apparent consensus around their narrative and hijacked the bitcoin name and ticker (BTC). I read the post again just before posting this and decided to refer to it to to add some kind of continuity to my story and hopefully save me writing so much out. Looking back on something you wrote is always a bit cringey especially because I can see that although I had made it a premise post, I was acting pretty confident that I was right and my tongue was acidic because of so much combating of shills on /biz/ but despite the fact I was wrong about the timing I stand by much of what I wrote then and want to expand upon it a bit more now.
The fork of the bitcoin protocol in to bitcoin core (BTC) and bitcoin cash (BCH) is the biggest value fork of the many that have occurred. There were a few others that forked off from the core chain that haven’t had any kind of attention put on them, positive or negative and I guess just keep chugging away as their own implementation. The bitcoin cash chain was supposed to be the camp that backed on chain scaling in the debate, but it turned out not everyone was entirely on board with that and some players/hashpower felt it was better to do a layer two type solution themselves although with bigger blocks servicing the second layer. Throughout what was now emerging as a debate within the BCH camp, Craig Wright and Calvin Ayre of Coin Geek said they were going to support massive on chain scaling, do a node implementation that would aim to restore bitcoin back to the 0.1.0 release which had all kinds of functionality included in it that had later been stripped by Core developers over the years and plan to bankrupt the people from Core who changed their mind on agreeing with on-chain scaling. This lead to a fork off the BCH chain in to bitcoin satoshis vision (BSV) and bitcoin cash ABC.

https://bitstagram.bitdb.network/m/raw/cbb50c322a2a89f3c627e1680a3f40d4ad3cee5a3fb153e5d6d001bdf85de404

The premise for this post is that Craig S Wright was Satoshi Nakamoto. It’s an interesting premise because depending upon your frame of reference the premise may either be a fact or to some too outrageous to even believe as a premise. Yesterday it was announced via CoinGeek that Craig Steven Wright has been granted the copyright claim for both the bitcoin white-paper under the pen name Satoshi Nakamoto and the original 0.1.0 bitcoin software (both of which were marked (c) copyright of satoshi nakamoto. The reactions to the news can kind of be classified in to four different reactions. Those who heard it and rejected it, those who heard it but remained undecided, those who heard it and accepted it, and those who already believed he was. Apparently to many the price was unexpected and such a revelation wasn’t exactly priced in to the market with the price immediately pumping nearly 100% upon the news breaking. However, to some others it was a vindication of something they already believed. This is an interesting phenomena to observe. For many years now I have always occupied a somewhat positively contrarian position to the default narrative put forward to things so it’s not entirely surprising that I find myself in a camp that holds the minority opinion. As you can see in the bitcoin dethroned piece I called Craig fake satoshi, but over the last year and bit I investigated the story around Craig and came to my conclusion that I believed him to be at least a major part of a team of people who worked on the protocol I have to admit that through reading his articles, I have kind of been brought full circle to where my contrarian opinion has me becoming somewhat of an advocate for “the system’.
https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-creator-craig-s-wright-satoshi-nakamoto-granted-us-copyright-registrations-for-bitcoin-white-paper-and-code/

When the news dropped, many took to social media to see what everyone was saying about it. On /biz/ a barrage of threads popped up discussing it with many celebrating and many rejecting the significance of such a copyright claim being granted. Immediately in nearly every thread there was a posting of an image of a person from twitter claiming that registering for copyright is an easy process that’s granted automatically unless challenged and so it doesn’t mean anything. This was enough for many to convince them of the insignificance of the revelation because of the comment from a person who claimed to have authority on twitter. Others chimed in to add that in fact there was a review of the copyright registration especially in high profile instances and these reviewers were satisfied with the evidence provided by Craig for the claim. At the moment Craig is being sued by Ira Kleiman for an amount of bitcoin that he believes he is entitled to because of Craig and Ira’s brother Dave working together on bitcoin. He is also engaged in suing a number of people from the cryptocurrency community for libel and defamation after they continued to use their social media/influencer positions to call him a fraud and a liar. He also has a number of patents lodged through his company nChain that are related to blockchain technologies. This has many people up in arms because in their mind Satoshi was part of a cypherpunk movement, wanted anonymity, endorsed what they believed to be an anti state and open source technologies and would use cryptography rather than court to prove his identity and would have no interest in patents.
https://bitstagram.bitdb.network/m/raw/1fce34a7004759f8db16b2ae9678e9c6db434ff2e399f59b5a537f72eff2c1a1
https://imgur.com/a/aANAsL3)

If you listen to Craig with an open mind, what cannot be denied is the man is bloody smart. Whether he is honest or not is up to you to decide, but personally I try to give everyone the benefit of the doubt and then cut them off if i find them to be dishonest. What I haven’t really been able to do with my investigation of craig is cut him off. There have been many moments where I disagree with what he has had to say but I don’t think people having an opinion about something that I believe to be incorrect is the same as being a dishonest person. It’s very important to distinguish the two and if you are unable to do so there is a very real risk of you projecting expectations or ideals upon someone based off your ideas of who they are. Many times if someone is telling the truth but you don’t understand it, instead of acknowledging you don’t understand it, you label them as being stupid or dishonest. I think that has happened to an extreme extent with Craig. Let’s take for example the moment when someone in the slack channel asked Craig if he had had his IQ tested and what it was. Craig replied with 179. The vast majority of people on the internet have heard someone quote their IQ before in an argument or the IQ of others and to hear someone say such a score that is actually 6 standard deviations away from the mean score (so probably something like 1/100 000) immediately makes them reject it on the grounds of probability. Craig admits that he’s not the best with people and having worked with/taught many high functioning people (sometimes on the spectrum perhaps) on complex anatomical and physiological systems I have seen some that also share the same difficulties in relating to people and reconciling their genius and understandings with more average intelligences. Before rejecting his claim outright because we don’t understand much of what he says, it would be prudent to first check is there any evidence that may lend support to his claim of a one in a million intelligence quotient.

Craig has mentioned on a number of occasions that he holds a number of different degrees and certifications in relation to law, cryptography, statistics, mathematics, economics, theology, computer science, information technology/security. I guess that does sound like something someone with an extremely high intelligence could achieve. Now I haven’t validated all of them but from a simple check on Charles Sturt’s alumni portal using his birthday of 23rd of October 1970 we can see that he does in fact have 3 Masters and a PhD from Charles Sturt. Other pictures I have seen from his office at nChain have degrees in frames on the wall and a developer published a video titled Craig Wright is a Genius with 17 degrees where he went and validated at least 8 of them I believe. He is recently publishing his Doctorate of Theology through an on-chain social media page that you have to pay a little bit for access to sections of his thesis. It’s titled the gnarled roots of creation. He has also mentioned on a number of occasions his vast industry experience as both a security contractor and business owner. An archive from his LinkedIn can be seen below as well.

LinkedIn - https://archive.is/Q66Gl
https://youtu.be/nXdkczX5mR0 - Craig Wright is a Genius with 17 Degrees
https://www.yours.org/content/gnarled-roots-of-a-creation-mythos-45e69558fae0 - Gnarled Roots of Creation.
In fact here is an on chain collection of articles and videos relating to Craig called the library of craig - https://www.bitpaste.app/tx/94b361b205196560d1bd09e4e3b3ec7ad6bea478af204cabfe243efd8fc944dd


So there is a guy with 17 degrees, a self professed one in a hundred thousand IQ, who’s worked for Australian Federal Police, ASIO, NSA, NASA, ASX. He’s been in Royal Australian Air Force, operated a number of businesses in Australia, published half a dozen academic papers on networks, cryptography, security, taught machine learning and digital forensics at a number of universities and then another few hundred short articles on medium about his work in these various domains, has filed allegedly 700 patents on blockchain related technology that he is going to release on bitcoin sv, copyrighted the name so that he may prevent other competing protocols from using the brand name, that is telling you he is the guy that invented the technology that he has a whole host of other circumstantial evidence to support that, but people won’t believe that because they saw something that a talking head on twitter posted or that a Core Developer said, or a random document that appears online with a C S Wright signature on it that lists access to an address that is actually related to Roger Ver, that’s enough to write him off as a scam. Even then when he publishes a photo of the paper copy which appears to supersede the scanned one, people still don’t readjust their positions on the matter and resort back to “all he has to do is move the coins or sign a tx”.

https://imgur.com/urJbe10

Yes Craig was on the Cypherpunk mailing list back in the day, but that doesn’t mean that he was or is an anarchist. Or that he shares the same ideas that Code Is Law that many from the crypto community like to espouse. I myself have definitely been someone to parrot the phrase myself before reading lots of Craig’s articles and trying to understand where he is coming from. What I have come to learn from listening and reading the man, is that although I might be fed up with the systems we have in place, they still exist to perform important functions within society and because of that the tools we develop to serve us have to exist within that preexisting legal and social framework in order for them to have any chance at achieving global success in replacing fiat money with the first mathematically provably scarce commodity. He says he designed bitcoin to be an immutable data ledger where everyone is forced to be honest, and economically disincentivised to perform attacks within the network because of the logs kept in a Write Once Read Many (WORM) ledger with hierarchical cryptographic keys. In doing so you eliminate 99% of cyber crime, create transparent DAO type organisations that can be audited and fully compliant with legislature that’s developed by policy that comes from direct democratic voting software. Everyone who wants anonymous coins wants to have them so they can do dishonest things, illegal things, buy drugs, launder money, avoid taxes.

Now this triggers me a fair bit as someone who has bought drugs online, who probably hasn’t paid enough tax, who has done illegal things contemplating what it means to have that kind of an evidence ledger, and contemplate a reality where there are anonymous cryptocurrencies, where massive corporations continue to be able to avoid taxes, or where methamphetamine can be sold by the tonne, or where people can be bought and sold. This is the reality of creating technologies that can enable and empower criminals. I know some criminals and regard them as very good friends, but I know there are some criminals that I do not wish to know at all. I know there are people that do horrific things in the world and I know that something that makes it easier for them is having access to funds or the ability to move money around without being detected. I know arms, drugs and people are some of the biggest markets in the world, I know there is more than $50 trillion dollars siphoned in to off shore tax havens from the value generated as the product of human creativity in the economy and how much human charity is squandered through the NGO apparatus. I could go on and on about the crappy things happening in the world but I can also imagine them getting a lot worse with an anonymous cryptocurrency. Not to say that I don’t think there shouldn’t be an anonymous cryptocurrency. If someone makes one that works, they make one that works. Maybe they get to exist for a little while as a honeypot or if they can operate outside the law successfully longer, but bitcoin itself shouldn’t be one. There should be something a level playing field for honest people to interact with sound money. And if they operate within the law, then they will have more than adequate privacy, just they will leave immutable evidence for every transaction that can be used as evidence to build a case against you committing a crime.

His claim is that all the people that are protesting the loudest about him being Satoshi are all the people that are engaged in dishonest business or that have a vested interest in there not being one singular global ledger but rather a whole myriad of alternative currencies that can be pumped and dumped against one another, have all kinds of financial instruments applied to them like futures and then have these exchanges and custodial services not doing any Know Your Customer (KYC) or Anti Money Laundering (AML) processes. Bitcoin SV was delisted by a number of exchanges recently after Craig launched legal action at some twitter crypto influencetalking heads who had continued to call him a fraud and then didn’t back down when the CEO of one of the biggest crypto exchanges told him to drop the case or he would delist his coin. The trolls of twitter all chimed in in support of those who have now been served with papers for defamation and libel and Craig even put out a bitcoin reward for a DOX on one of the people who had been particularly abusive to him on twitter. A big european exchange then conducted a twitter poll to determine whether or not BSV should be delisted as either (yes, it’s toxic or no) and when a few hundred votes were in favour of delisting it (which can be bought for a couple of bucks/100 votes). Shortly after Craig was delisted, news began to break of a US dollar stable coin called USDT potentially not being fully solvent for it’s apparent 1:1 backing of the token to dollars in the bank. Binance suffered an alleged exchange hack with 7000 BTC “stolen” and the site suspending withdrawals and deposits for a week. Binance holds 800m USDT for their US dollar markets and immediately once the deposits and withdrawals were suspended there was a massive pump for BTC in the USDT markets as people sought to exit their potentially not 1:1 backed token for bitcoin. The CEO of this exchange has the business registered out of Malta, no physical premises, the CEO stays hotel room to hotel room around the world, has all kind of trading competitions and the binance launchpad, uses an unregistered security to collect fees ($450m during the bear market) from the trading of the hundreds of coins that it lists on its exchange and has no regard for AML and KYC laws. Craig said he himself was able to create 100 gmail accounts in a day and create binance accounts with each of those gmail accounts and from the same wallet, deposit and withdraw 1 bitcoin into each of those in one day ($8000 x 100) without facing any restrictions or triggering any alerts or such.
This post could ramble on for ever and ever exposing the complexities of the rabbit hole but I wanted to offer some perspective on what’s been happening in the space. What is being built on the bitcoin SV blockchain is something that I can only partially comprehend but even from my limited understanding of what it is to become, I can see that the entirety of the crypto community is extremely threatened as it renders all the various alt coins and alt coin exchanges obsolete. It makes criminals play by the rules, it removes any power from the developer groups and turns the blockchain and the miners in to economies of scale where the blockchain acts as a serverless database, the miners provide computational resources/storage/RAM and you interact with a virtual machine through a monitor and keyboard plugged in to an ethernet port. It will be like something that takes us from a type 0 to a type 1 civilisation. There are many that like to keep us in the quagmire of corruption and criminality as it lines their pockets. Much much more can be read about the Cartel in crypto in the archive below. Is it possible this cartel has the resources to mount such a successful psychological operation on the cryptocurrency community that they manage to convince everyone that Craig is the bad guy, when he’s the only one calling for regulation, the application of the law, the storage of immutable records onchain to comply with banking secrecy laws, for Global Sound Money?

https://archive.fo/lk1lH#selection-3671.46-3671.55

Please note, where possible, images were uploaded onto the bitcoin sv blockchain through bitstagram paying about 10c a pop. If I wished I could then use an application etch and archive this post to the chain to be immutably stored. If this publishing forum was on chain too it would mean that when I do the archive the images that are in the bitstragram links (but stored in the bitcoin blockchain/database already) could be referenced in the archive by their txid so that they don’t have to be stored again and thus bringing the cost of the archive down to only the html and css.
submitted by whipnil to C_S_T [link] [comments]

Error when running a bitcoin core node: Corruption: not an sstable (bad magic number)

I try to run a bitcoin core node using 180 GB of blockchain data that I have in a hard drive:
bitcoind.exe --datadir=I:\Bitcoin\Bitcoin_core\Bitcoin\blockchain 
But I get the error
Error: Error: A fatal internal error occurred, see debug.log for details 
Debug.log looks like this:
2018-07-18 19:36:03 Bitcoin Core version v0.16.0 (release build) 2018-07-18 19:36:03 InitParameterInteraction: parameter interaction: -whitelistforcerelay=1 -> setting -whitelistrelay=1 2018-07-18 19:36:03 Warning: Reducing -maxconnections from 9999 to 1015, because of system limitations. 2018-07-18 19:36:03 Assuming ancestors of block 0000000000000000005214481d2d96f898e3d5416e43359c145944a909d242e0 have valid signatures. 2018-07-18 19:36:03 Setting nMinimumChainWork=000000000000000000000000000000000000000000f91c579d57cad4bc5278cc 2018-07-18 19:36:03 Using the 'sse4' SHA256 implementation 2018-07-18 19:36:03 Using RdRand as an additional entropy source 2018-07-18 19:36:05 Default data directory C:\Users\Pedro FR\AppData\Roaming\Bitcoin 2018-07-18 19:36:05 Using data directory G:\Bitcoin\Bitcoin_core\Bitcoin\blockchain 2018-07-18 19:36:05 Using config file G:\Bitcoin\Bitcoin_core\Bitcoin\blockchain\bitcoin.conf 2018-07-18 19:36:05 Using at most 1015 automatic connections (2048 file descriptors available) 2018-07-18 19:36:05 Using 16 MiB out of 32/2 requested for signature cache, able to store 524288 elements 2018-07-18 19:36:05 Using 16 MiB out of 32/2 requested for script execution cache, able to store 524288 elements 2018-07-18 19:36:05 Using 4 threads for script verification 2018-07-18 19:36:05 scheduler thread start 2018-07-18 19:36:05 libevent: getaddrinfo: nodename nor servname provided, or not known 2018-07-18 19:36:05 Binding RPC on address ::1 port 8332 failed. 2018-07-18 19:36:05 HTTP: creating work queue of depth 16 2018-07-18 19:36:05 Config options rpcuser and rpcpassword will soon be deprecated. Locally-run instances may remove rpcuser to use cookie-based auth, or may be replaced with rpcauth. Please see share/rpcuser for rpcauth auth generation. 2018-07-18 19:36:05 HTTP: starting 4 worker threads 2018-07-18 19:36:05 Using wallet directory G:\Bitcoin\Bitcoin_core\Bitcoin\blockchain 2018-07-18 19:36:05 init message: Verifying wallet(s)... 2018-07-18 19:36:05 Using BerkeleyDB version Berkeley DB 4.8.30: (April 9, 2010) 2018-07-18 19:36:05 Using wallet wallet.dat 2018-07-18 19:36:05 CDBEnv::Open: LogDir=G:\Bitcoin\Bitcoin_core\Bitcoin\blockchain\database ErrorFile=G:\Bitcoin\Bitcoin_core\Bitcoin\blockchain\db.log 2018-07-18 19:36:05 Cache configuration: 2018-07-18 19:36:05 * Using 56.2MiB for block index database 2018-07-18 19:36:05 * Using 8.0MiB for chain state database 2018-07-18 19:36:05 * Using 385.8MiB for in-memory UTXO set (plus up to 2861.0MiB of unused mempool space) 2018-07-18 19:36:05 init message: Loading block index... 2018-07-18 19:36:05 Opening LevelDB in G:\Bitcoin\Bitcoin_core\Bitcoin\blockchain\blocks\index 2018-07-18 19:36:05 Opened LevelDB successfully 2018-07-18 19:36:05 Using obfuscation key for G:\Bitcoin\Bitcoin_core\Bitcoin\blockchain\blocks\index: 0000000000000000 2018-07-18 19:36:29 LoadBlockIndexDB: last block file = 1259 2018-07-18 19:36:29 LoadBlockIndexDB: last block file info: CBlockFileInfo(blocks=215, size=130126593, heights=522250...522561, time=2018-05-11...2018-05-13) 2018-07-18 19:36:29 Checking all blk files are present... 2018-07-18 19:36:29 LoadBlockIndexDB: transaction index enabled 2018-07-18 19:36:29 Opening LevelDB in G:\Bitcoin\Bitcoin_core\Bitcoin\blockchain\chainstate 2018-07-18 19:36:30 Opened LevelDB successfully 2018-07-18 19:36:30 Using obfuscation key for G:\Bitcoin\Bitcoin_core\Bitcoin\blockchain\chainstate: f686f3dcea7b64ab 2018-07-18 19:36:30 Loaded best chain: hashBestChain=0000000000000000003f9855f4abee6286e4ff677d366db7b0f24c414caf49cc height=518349 date=2018-04-15 17:14:57 progress=0.916016 2018-07-18 19:36:30 init message: Rewinding blocks... 2018-07-18 19:36:36 Corruption: not an sstable (bad magic number) 2018-07-18 19:36:36 *** System error while flushing: Database corrupted 2018-07-18 19:36:36 Error: Error: A fatal internal error occurred, see debug.log for details 2018-07-18 19:36:36 Shutdown requested. Exiting. 2018-07-18 19:36:36 Shutdown: In progress... 2018-07-18 19:36:36 scheduler thread interrupt 2018-07-18 19:36:36 Corruption: not an sstable (bad magic number) 2018-07-18 19:36:36 *** System error while flushing: Database corrupted 2018-07-18 19:36:36 Error: Error: A fatal internal error occurred, see debug.log for details 2018-07-18 19:36:36 Corruption: not an sstable (bad magic number) 2018-07-18 19:36:36 *** System error while flushing: Database corrupted 2018-07-18 19:36:36 Error: Error: A fatal internal error occurred, see debug.log for details 2018-07-18 19:36:36 Shutdown: done 
I don't remeber messing around with the blockchain data. I think the error first occurred when I was trying to run a node on a Linux machine, I get the same error on both devices. Would be great if I didn't have to download the blockchain all over again.
submitted by johnturtle to BitcoinBeginners [link] [comments]

https://dogdata.io/ #ETHBNT #ETHBN #Dog_welfare #Dog_Breeding #DogData #IEO #blockchain #crypto #bitcoin #etherum Dog microchip and vaccination immunisation on the PedigreeChain, an international Dog registration database using blockchain technology.

submitted by sainisunita01 to Crypto_Alliance [link] [comments]

IBM, MIT and Elliptic release database of 200'000 bitcoin transactions classified as "criminal" or "hopefully not criminal". That should help people evaluate the other 500'000'000 transactions in the blockchain.

IBM, MIT and Elliptic release database of 200'000 bitcoin transactions classified as submitted by jstolfi to Buttcoin [link] [comments]

Anyone who said that the bitcoin blockchain is not performing has never tried to put all the data into a MySQL database..

Anyone who said that the bitcoin blockchain is not performing has never tried to put all the data into a MySQL database.. submitted by coinforensics to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Evolution of blockchain without Bitcoin: Sound money -> crappy database -> Ponzi scheme

Evolution of blockchain without Bitcoin: Sound money -> crappy database -> Ponzi scheme submitted by Bitcoin_21 to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

_unwriter: "Most Bitcoin applications that use the blockchain as a database DO NOT need all the transaction details because they only need to query OP_RETURN outputs and a couple of other attributes. This is what Babel provides. Babel is a database for data-only Bitcoin apps"

_unwriter: submitted by cryptorebel to bitcoincashSV [link] [comments]

"BitIndex API is now public for #Bitcoin #SatoshiVision developers. Build your app faster and spend less time managing UTXOs and Wallets for Bitcoin. Real-time UTXO database, manage wallets (XPUB suppport) and blockchain API. Get your API key at http://bitindex.network #BSV"

submitted by cryptorebel to bitcoincashSV [link] [comments]

Syscoin is considered as “a global network, a distributed ledger, a decentralized database, and a blockchain.” It is also a cryptocurrency, a digital currency, an altcoin, and a tradable token.” It is based on a fork of the Bitcoin protocol and is merge-mined with Bitcoin, giving the most secure, s

Syscoin is considered as “a global network, a distributed ledger, a decentralized database, and a blockchain.” It is also a cryptocurrency, a digital currency, an altcoin, and a tradable token.” It is based on a fork of the Bitcoin protocol and is merge-mined with Bitcoin, giving the most secure, s submitted by sergioweston to CryptoNewsandTalk [link] [comments]

Wrote a short article on how blockchain databases work to celebrate Bitcoin's birthday!

submitted by pgh_ski to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

In 2016 people will understand that the Bitcoin blockchain is the only unhackable database. This is what happens when a bank database gets hacked ...

In 2016 people will understand that the Bitcoin blockchain is the only unhackable database. This is what happens when a bank database gets hacked ... submitted by Byzantine-General to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

_unwriter: "Most Bitcoin applications that use the blockchain as a database DO NOT need all the transaction details because they only need to query OP_RETURN outputs and a couple of other attributes. This is what Babel provides. Babel is a database for data-only Bitcoin apps"

_unwriter: submitted by ABitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

"BitIndex API is now public for #Bitcoin #SatoshiVision developers. Build your app faster and spend less time managing UTXOs and Wallets for Bitcoin. Real-time UTXO database, manage wallets (XPUB suppport) and blockchain API. Get your API key at http://bitindex.network #BSV"

submitted by ABitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

_unwriter: "Most Bitcoin applications that use the blockchain as a database DO NOT need all the transaction details because they only need to query OP_RETURN outputs and a couple of other attributes. This is what Babel provides. Babel is a database for data-only Bitcoin apps"

_unwriter: submitted by cryptoallbot to cryptoall [link] [comments]

@nytimesbusiness: A cryptocurrency millionaire named Jeffrey Berns imagines a sort of experimental community spread over about a hundred square miles.The centerpiece of this giant project will be the blockchain, a new kind of database that was introduced by Bitcoin. https://t.co/LLLWz4WTX0

@nytimesbusiness: A cryptocurrency millionaire named Jeffrey Berns imagines a sort of experimental community spread over about a hundred square miles.The centerpiece of this giant project will be the blockchain, a new kind of database that was introduced by Bitcoin. https://t.co/LLLWz4WTX0 submitted by -en- to newsbotMARKET [link] [comments]

@dealbook: A cryptocurrency millionaire named Jeffrey Berns imagines a sort of experimental community spread over about a hundred square miles.The centerpiece of this giant project will be the blockchain, a new kind of database that was introduced by Bitcoin. https://t.co/WdBPVFs7Ns

@dealbook: A cryptocurrency millionaire named Jeffrey Berns imagines a sort of experimental community spread over about a hundred square miles.The centerpiece of this giant project will be the blockchain, a new kind of database that was introduced by Bitcoin. https://t.co/WdBPVFs7Ns submitted by -en- to newsbotMARKET [link] [comments]

Now the military is interested in bitcoin - "potential offensive and defensive cyber applications of blockchain technology and other distributed database technologies."

Now the military is interested in bitcoin - submitted by ImmortalAl to conspiracy [link] [comments]

@nytimestech: Our @mcorkery5 and @nathanielpopper write that Walmart says it has better system for pinpointing which vegetables might be contaminated. It said that after experimenting, it will be turning to the blockchain, the type of database technology behind Bitcoin. https://t.co/be2AMUQ9yK

@nytimestech: Our @mcorkery5 and @nathanielpopper write that Walmart says it has better system for pinpointing which vegetables might be contaminated. It said that after experimenting, it will be turning to the blockchain, the type of database technology behind Bitcoin. https://t.co/be2AMUQ9yK submitted by -en- to newsbotTMT [link] [comments]

Anyone who said that the bitcoin blockchain is not performing has never tried to put all the data into a MySQL database..

Anyone who said that the bitcoin blockchain is not performing has never tried to put all the data into a MySQL database.. submitted by ABitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

@dealbook: From Bitcoin to Spinach, the Blockchain goes mainstream. How Walmart is bringing the shared database to the grocery aisle. https://t.co/LPm9gP36uF

@dealbook: From Bitcoin to Spinach, the Blockchain goes mainstream. How Walmart is bringing the shared database to the grocery aisle. https://t.co/LPm9gP36uF submitted by -en- to newsbotMARKET [link] [comments]

How does bitcoin transactions work - Blockchain series - Part - 2 The Bitcoin and Blockchain Technology Explained 2020-BITCIOIN(BLOCKCHAIN)PRIVATE KEY GENERATOR INSTANTLY IMPORT AND SPENT NON-SPENTABLE BITCOINS$$!! Permissioned Blockchains and Databases BigchainDB - the blockchain database - YouTube

Buying crypto like Bitcoin and Ether is as easy as verifying your identity, adding a payment and clicking "Buy". Sign up for our Wallet today. Create Wallet. Trade Crypto at the Exchange. Integrated with the Blockchain Wallet, our Exchange is a one-stop shop where you can deposit funds and place trades seamlessly in minutes. Get Started. Dive The best way to access transaction database for analysis is probably through the blockchain.info API. You can also use the Bitcoin Block Explorer; in fact, this is what a study of the Bitcoin network did. Unfortunately, the features that give Bitcoin-like uses of blockchains these features also significantly degrade performance. Specifically, while writing to a relational database is fairly fast, writing to Bitcoin’s blockchain is intentionally hard (necessary to prevent Sybil attacks on it). As a result, it's relatively slow. The total number of mined bitcoin that are currently circulating on the network. Market Price. The average USD market price across major bitcoin exchanges. Market Capitalization (USD) The total size of the blockchain minus database indexes in megabytes. Average Block Size (MB) The average block size over the past 24 hours in megabytes. Bitcoin Abuse Database. Tracking bitcoin addresses used by ransomware, blackmailers, fraudsters, etc. There have been 106 reports in the last day, 1,041 reports in the last week, and 4,126 reports in the last month.. File report View Reports

[index] [13746] [39352] [18137] [46063] [43226] [14072] [167] [31043] [18008] [34434]

How does bitcoin transactions work - Blockchain series - Part - 2

Bitcoin's underlying technology is called Blockchain. The Blockchain is a distributed decentralized incorruptible database (ledger) that records blocks of digital information. Each block contains ... but you can everyday use the same or another target bitcoin address to find their bitcoins private keys randomly and withdraw bitcoin to own blockchain wallet daily. SOFTWARE PURCHASE DETAILS: Block (a chain of blocks) is a distributed database, in which storage devices are not connected to a shared server. This database stores an ever-growing list of ordered records called blocks. Each ... Blockchain (distributed ledger), the underlying technology of Bitcoin, has become very popular for use in commercial or permissioned environments. Computer companies like IBM and Microsoft, and ... Educating about the Blockchain Technology by BigchainDB's founders. ... Ascribe Pitch by Bruce Pon in Blockchain / Bitcoin category at European FinTech Awards 2016 ... A blockchain database for ...